UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for File-Sharing

UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for File-Sharing

July 15, 2010

A trade group representing the music industry in the United Kingdom wants internet service providers in the region to pay a fee to combat piracy. The group, PRS for Music, represents around 65,000 songwriters and publishers and is also comprised of another group - the Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society.

The group proposes that ISPs either combat unlicensed media files on their networks or pay a fee to blanket license copyrighted material and offer it to its users. In other words, copyright enforcement becomes the job of ISPs. The organization also suggests an alternative where ISPs could be charged for "blanket licenses" so that they can "determine for themselves how best to capture the raw value of media on networks."

"Operators would face a fee for the transmission of unlicensed media on their networks though that fee would be reduced in line with reductions in the volume of unlicensed media transmitted," according to the proposal from PRS for Music.

Meanwhile, the Internet Services Providers' Association UK, a trade group that represents about 200 companies, said that it strongly opposes the ideas put forth by PRS For Music. Instead the group would prefer a "market-based approach, reforming "the licensing framework so that legal content can be distributed online to consumers in a way that they are demanding."

"We reject the idea that ISPs should have to pay a fee for levels of copyright infringement that may occur on their networks," the group told PC world in an e-mail statement.

Copyright infringement in the U.K. has been getting a lot of attention lately; politicians in the country recently passed the Digital Economy Act, which assigns new responsibilities to communications regulator Ofcom. Ofcom is obligated to create a "code of practice for ISPs aimed at reducing online copyright infringement." Ofcom has already drafted and published a plan and is open to public comments through July 30. The draft includes guidelines for ISPs to limit or cut off Internet access for users accused of illegally sharing files without copyright holder permission.

But PRS For Music faces another hurdle in its plan, which it notes in its proposal: "safe harbor" legislation in the U.S. and Europe:

"In the United States and Europe, the ISP is not necessarily liable for the infringement of rights by their customers because of the safe harbors granted through e-commerce legislation," it said.

PRS for Music noted in its paper that it would be necessary to revisit these safe harbor rules so that rights holders could license ISPs content for file sharing on their networks.

 

Source: PC World

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for ...

These shenanigans aren't anything new.  Remember the blank tape tax the RIAA proposed in the mid-1980's?

Probably not; Tipper Gore was so busy trying to regulate content that it slipped under the radar.

Re: UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for ...

I don't see ISP companies paying up for the piracy there customers could do.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for ...

Should, then, the recording industry pay a set amount each year to the courts, for the legal cases their artists might get involved in etc? Should they pay money to hotels, to cover the cost of damage that their artists might cause? Better still, and a closer analogy, should they pay for the acts of their customers?

Re: UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for ...

By the same logic, should car manufacturers pay damages when one of their customers manages to run someone over?

Re: UK Trade Group Proposal Suggest ISPs Pay for ...

HAahahaahahahahhaa....file share is the cost of business these days since the internet and all makes it impracticable to try and stop people from shareing. Its easier to go after sites that make money of the trade of files than the people who download.....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/

ECA IconA PUBLICATION OF THE ECA RSS IconSUBSCRIBE User LoginLOGIN / REGISTER

Crispy Gamer




       

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 09/09/10 at 10:57am
PHX Corp: Not to mention Fucking, Austria and shitterton, England
Posted 09/09/10 at 10:55am
SimonBob: Or perhaps you'd care for a trip to scenic Dildo? ("See Also" section has even more knee-slappers.)
Posted 09/09/10 at 10:53am
SimonBob: To say nothing of Blow Me Down Provincial Park in Newfoundland.
Posted 09/09/10 at 10:03am
JDKJ: Fort Dix.
Posted 09/09/10 at 02:19am
Andrew Eisen: Were they ever officially referred to as the Taliban?
Posted 09/08/10 at 11:21pm
Cheater87: EA might of backed down and censored MOH Taliban no longer called Taliban but "insurgents".
Posted 09/08/10 at 09:31pm
PHX Corp: Kotaku's Humorus Take on the Fort Gay incident
Posted 09/08/10 at 04:38pm
PHX Corp: even though it's old There is a connection between US v stevens and EMA v California
Posted 09/08/10 at 03:51pm
Michael Chandra: Same thing as last week or not?
Posted 09/08/10 at 03:50pm
Michael Chandra: European Parliament has apparently adopted a Written Declaration that objects against the lack of transparancy.
Posted 09/08/10 at 12:19pm
Andrew Eisen: Not much worldwide: Gay, Russia. Gaywood, UK. And again, a stretch, Agay, France.
Posted 09/08/10 at 12:17pm
Andrew Eisen: Also: Gays Creek, Kentucky. Gay, West Virginia. Gaysville, Vermont. And Gaylordsville, Connecticut.
Posted 09/08/10 at 12:01pm
Andrew Eisen: In the US: Gay, Georgia. Gays, Illinois. Gayville, South Dakota. Mount Gay-Shamrock, Virginia. Gays Mills, Wisconsin. A bit of a stretch but there are also three cities named Gaylord.
Posted 09/08/10 at 11:57am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: And still they didn´t want to lift the ban.
Posted 09/08/10 at 11:52am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: Still, the funny part is when the mayor of the city intervined. How many cities in the world have the word gay?
Posted 09/08/10 at 11:44am
Andrew Eisen: But, according to the article, the suspension was eventually revoked.
Posted 09/08/10 at 11:35am
Rodrigo Ybáñez García: XboxLive still at it: bans a guy for living in Fort Gay, W. Virginia.
Posted 09/08/10 at 08:56am
ZippyDSMlee: Ya our colly of 12 years died a few months back and they got a puppy.....oh well the lil rat dog is cute. LOL
Posted 09/08/10 at 08:20am
pete_gallagher: @PHX Corp, sorry to hear that, condolences :(
Posted 09/07/10 at 11:20pm
PHX Corp: My Dog, sparky Just Passed away as of 12mid, of old age.
Login or register to post shouts